Published
6 years agoon
By
CalMattersThe modern American gun debate began on May 2, 1967, when 30 protesting members of the Black Panther Party marched into the California Capitol with loaded handguns, shotguns and rifles.
California has a reputation for being tough on guns. That reputation is well-earned.
Researchers at Boston University have counted 109 California laws that in some way restrict “the manner and space in which firearms can be used.” They include regulations on dealers and buyers, background check requirements, and possession bans directed at certain “high risk” individuals.
By their count, no other state out-regulates California when it comes to sheer quantity of rules. And we’ve held that top spot since at least 1991, the year the researchers started counting.The Giffords Law Center To Prevent Gun Violence, a gun control advocacy group, awarded California its only “A” grade in its 2017 state gun law scorecard.
“There are not a lot of As out there,” said Ari Freilich, the organization’s California legislative affairs director. “California has driven the conversation nationally.”
In contrast, Guns and Ammo magazine labeled California the 5th worst state for gun owners. (Washington D.C. was the top jurisdiction, followed by New York.)
The story of how California became, according to many, the state with the nation’s most restrictive gun laws has largely followed a familiar pattern: alarm or tragedy, then a legislative response.
Guns laws cover the who, what, where, when and how of buying, selling, lending, leasing, storing and firing guns. By national standards, California law is strict on just about all of these points.
CALmatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.
California Pins Vaccine Hopes on Biden Administration
Walters: After COVID-19, Drought Threat Still Looms
Fierce California Winds Fan Fires, Topple Trees and Trucks
Monarch Butterfly Population Moves Closer to Extinction
Newsom Sets New Tone for California, White House Partnership
California Guard Pleads Guilty to Lies in Inmate’s Death
Martin
February 6, 2019 at 4:22 pm
All those rules and yet it doesn’t stop….more rules and still it doesn’t stop. Sorry to be so cliche…but definition of insanity. Unless the entire world agrees to get rid of their guns, the only people that will abide by gun laws are law-abiding citizens. People that commit murder, whether one, or a mass-shooting, are by definition not “law-abiding”. I know it’s been said more than a million times, but it is just simple logic; pass a law to get rid of ALL guns and the only guns you will get rid of are the ones that are owned by “law-abiding” citizens.
Politicians love simple solutions to complex problems, even if the solutions they are proposing do not correlate directly with cause and effect. Given the circumstances, it might be better to ask, what is it about our society in general that has created an environment where we have more gun laws than ever, but still have a perceived problem with shooting incidents. I say perceived, because while every premature death is saddening, statistics would dictate that we ban blunt objects, knives, and bad drivers over guns if it was simply about actually reducing premature deaths.