SACRAMENTO — California’s attorney general sued Paul Blanco’s Good Car Company on Monday, leveling accusations of false advertising and lying on loan documents to boost its profits at the expense of its mostly low-income customers.
Xavier Becerra’s lawsuit comes after a two-year investigation of the dealer known for its prolific TV and radio ads declaring itself the “good car people.”
“For many families, that name could not be farther from the truth,” said Becerra, a Democrat.
The company’s dealership in Fresno is among six in the state named in the lawsuit.
Lawsuit Alleges ‘Sophisticated Scheme’ to Lure Customers
A 32-page complaint filed in Alameda County accuses the company of running a sophisticated scheme to lure customers into a dealership only to later lie about their incomes and the value of the cars they were purchasing to convince lenders to approve the loans.
The complaint alleges some employees who objected to the techniques were fired while others were warned not to be a “snitch.”
The company paid for ads promising customers could get their credit checked over the phone, a tactic designed to avoid the embarrassing experience of having a loan denied in person. Call center operators had detailed scripts, which would include telling customers to “please hold while I process your application,” only to return five seconds later to congratulate them on meeting the credit criteria for “several of our lenders.”
But Becerra says an unnamed manager at the call center said operators would not process loan applications at all. Instead, the act was a ruse to collect information and generate sales leads.
Once customers arrived at the dealership, Becerra says the company would lie about how much money a potential borrower earned each year to deceive lenders. An audit by one finance company found that out of 320 incomes reported from the company’s location in Fresno, more than 78% of them were inflated by at least $500 per month.
Expensive Add-Ons Presented as Legal Requirements, Suit Says
Becerra also said the company made lots of money by selling optional add-ons, such as insurance or service contracts, by falsely telling customers they were required by law. In some cases, Becerra said customers did not know they were purchasing add-ons because employees would hide the paperwork by placing their hands over the disclosures — a technique employees at the dealership referred to as a “hands-down close.”
“We’re talking about hardworking families who make every dollar count, seeing their hard earned money swindled away by dishonest tactics that put them in unaffordable debt,” Becerra said.
All of this, Becerra says, is endorsed and encouraged by the company’s senior management, including Paul Blanco himself. The complaint said some employees who objected to the techniques were fired while others were warned not to be a “snitch.”
Seeking Restitution for Customers and Civil Penalties
“During sessions one manager called ‘lessons in larceny,’ Paul Blanco’s taught employees to lie to third-party lenders in order to obtain consumer if financing on false pretenses and boost dealership profits,” according to the complaint, written in part by Hunter Landerholm, a deputy attorney general who is handling the case.
Landerholm said the attorney general’s office is not asking a judge to shut the company down while the lawsuit is pending. But they are asking a judge to order the company to stop using these techniques and to make them pay restitution plus civil penalties.
The defendants include the company and Paul Blanco himself.
Becerra said he does not know how many customers were impacted, urging anyone who was impacted to contact his office.
Kelli Langley
September 24, 2019 at 9:39 am
First of all, why is the plaintiff’s political party (“a Democrat”) an issue? Did the company give better deals to Republicans and independents? What was the point of that???
And secondly, when they’re done with Paul Blanco, go after Keller in Hanford…their deals on new cars are awesome, but they also mislead people purchasing used cars on such things as interest rates, their “life-time warranty”, and most of the other issues that Mr. Becerra raises in his suit!